|
From: | Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: | Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: | Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:04:52 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: | nn/6.7.0 |
Rjack writes: >Aren't you a being a little presumptuous when you simply ignore the >doctrine of promissory estoppel when considering a failed license? What's the promise here? -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |