Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

[Rahul Dhesi]

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:

>The GPL is not a contract but a license.  It spells the conditions you
>have to meet.

I have seen different people call it both. And actually it doesn't
really matter what you call it.

What matters is whether somebody violating the GPL could be subject to
an injuction.  I think the answer is clearly YES.

And that ought to conclude the contact vs license argument.
-- 
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/