|
From: | amicus_curious |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:59:32 -0500 |
"Peter Köhlmann" <peter.koehlmann@arcor.de> wrote in message news:4980eee8$0$31874$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net...
Well, now you get to the heart of the matter. There is no reason to ever do that. People do not seem to want much GPL'd stuff, so there is little chance of being able to distribute it. The few computer hobbyists who do fool with it know enough to get it from the horse's mouth directly. The FSF just fusses about tellling fools like you that they are performing a socially valuable service, but most people know better.Why don't you just distribute some modified GPLed stuff and say that you will not supply the sources. Tell the FSF that you do so.
You and a couple of others keep suggesting that you have some line on my RL, but where do you get your information? Is it all from that silly Shestowitz?When you do *that* and don't have any adverse effects, you could be considered right. Until then, you are simply a dishonest lying nimwit. Which is, BTW, exactly what you are, Bill Weissgerber
Frequently it is, and the value of the copyright is assessed in terms of the money that it would have brought. The GPL stuff has no commercial value, so what is the penalty? The US copyright laws do not consider anything criminal until some money is involved.Since not accepting the GPL you are reverted automatically to copyright law. And in that case you are simply breaking the law by distributing stuff you don't own Now tell us that "copyright law" is not tested in courts
Gods, you are really a dishonest lying idiot
Any you are just a silly parrot.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |