|
From: | amicus_curious |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft needs a help strategy |
Date: | Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:53:10 -0500 |
"ZnU" <znu@fake.invalid> wrote in message znu-FD9FD3.22275528012009@news.individual.net">news:znu-FD9FD3.22275528012009@news.individual.net...
Well, it boils down to what was in the complaint that was dismissed with predjudice, I think. If you read the complaint, it wasn't so narrowly specified as you say.In article <4980da74$0$21786$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com>, "amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> wrote: Well, No. It means the plaintiff cannot bring the same complaint against the defendant in response to the same actions, which isn't quite the same thing and doesn't give Verizon the kind of broad immunity from the GPL with respect to BusyBox that you describe.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |