|
From: | Rahul Dhesi |
Subject: | Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: | Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:28:36 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: | nn/6.7.0 |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes: >As the United States Supreme Court unequivocally stated, ..."It goes >without saying that a contract cannot bind a nonparty.".... Can a person a non-party lawfully distribute GPL software? -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |