|
| From: | Hyman Rosen |
| Subject: | Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception" |
| Date: | Thu, 05 Feb 2009 10:23:10 -0500 |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) |
Rjack wrote:
I have argued that a compiler adds no creative element to qualify the "translation" because of its fixed algorithms but this is a legally unsupported *conjecture*.
It is the codified practice of the US Copyright Office. <http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/CopyrightCompendium/chapter_0300.asp>
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |