Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

[Hyman Rosen]

amicus_curious wrote:
> a more expansive view would say that the copyright holders
> were forced to abandon their suit after reading the handwriting
> on the wall.

And what evidence do you have for this claim? The evidence
for my claim is that the actual manufacturer makes the source
available, and the Verizon link contains "actiontec gateway".
Aside from wishful thinking, what proof do you have that the
SFLC was "forced to abandon their suit"?