[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:23:39 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Your "took all the papers" hypothetical is
> > inapplicable to the case at hand.
>
> Tell it to the judge.
Hyman, Hyman, when I was challenged with a similar request by another
brainwashed GNUtian, I've ordered (for USD 0 because it was a
pre-release beta stuff or something) a bunch of winxp64 downloads from
Microsoft's online shop and resold one of them on a CD for EURO 6.50 on
ebay.de. Item 7133325141.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2004-12/msg00095.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2005-03/msg00084.html
The rest 14 copies went to Debians.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00466.html
And I'm still not in prison. How come?
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", (continued)
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Andrew Halliwell, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Andrew Halliwell, 2009/02/08
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!",
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Doug Mentohl, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", amicus_curious, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/06
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Doug Mentohl, 2009/02/07
- Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!", Rjack, 2009/02/07