Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!"

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > 1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's
> >  source code as you receive it
>
> Were we discussing distribution of source code?
As a matter of fact we were.

> I thought the point of the discussion for anti-GPL people is to
> enable code grabbers to distribute binaries without source.

Sigh. . . Hymen the point of "GPL people" is to prevent GPL
advocates from falsely convincing innocent programmers that the GPL
license can steal their exclusive rights granted to them by under 17
USC 106.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)