|
| From: | Rahul Dhesi |
| Subject: | Re: Artifex v. Diebold: "The GPL is non-commercial!" |
| Date: | Sat, 7 Feb 2009 04:22:04 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-agent: | nn/6.7.0 |
Rjack <user@example.net> writes: >> Some might think it wise to use terms not specific to US law for >> software that will get worldwide propagation. Please explain >> why you seem to disagree. >Attempting to use a license for worldwide "propagation" (presumably >for one vast World Socialist Order) under disparate legal >jurisdictions is the ultimate folly ... But this doesn't explain why you seem to think that the license should use US-specific language. -- Rahul http://rahul.rahul.net/
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |