[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:37:23 +0100 |
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
> >> I was assuming you'd have already checked it, and would want to save
> >> others on the newsgroup, including me, from needless work. Have you
> >> checked it, Alex? Does the download offered on that page violate the
> >> GPL?
>
> > Sure it does violate the GPL, Alan. Go to Verizon's download page and
> > try to find accompanied text of the GPL and/or sources (or "a written
> > offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party, for a
> > charge no more than your cost of physically performing source
> > distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding
> > source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above
> > on a medium customarily used for software interchange").
>
> Is it actually GPL software that's being offered from that page?
What is your guess, Alan?
> If so, is the source code for it available?
It is certainly available somewhere (e.g. the busybox project's site
itself), but *Verizon* doesn't make it available as promulgated by the
GPLv2 Section 3.
[...]
> >> > http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/DISMISSAL.pdf
>
> >> The notice is actually of voluntary dismissal, and there is no sign of
> >> anything "against" the plaintiffs.
>
> > Man oh man. It is by definition of "dismissal with prejudice" that it is
> > against the plaintiffs, idiot. Dismissal with prejudice is detrimental
> > to plaintiffs, not defendants.
>
> No, the "predjudice" bit just means the case can't be restarted.
And that means what to you, Alan? Hint:
Verizon: Hey busybox guys, we continue doing all the bad things you have
alleged in your claims against us. Thank you for your voluntary
dismissal with prejudice.
Busybox guys: Oops.
Hth.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/15
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, ZnU, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, ZnU, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/14
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/02/15