[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:13:13 +0100 |
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
> > He knows just too well that Verizon is actually in compliance now, and for
> > that reason can distribute the binaries.
>
> Yes, I've kind of gathered that.
Verizon. Is. Not. In. Complience. Got it now, Alan?
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
>
> > There has never been a case where a company distributing GPLed software
> > continued to do so without coming into compliance when the FSS (or for
> > example H. Welte in germany) went to court.
>
> Yes. That guy deserves an award!
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2009/01/26/
http://www.wilmerhale.com/de/publications/whPubsDetail.aspx?publication=338
:-)
BTW, Welte's (together with... guess who? right, whom else... the busy
box guys) latest GPL stunce is in France.
http://freebox.flouzo.fr/forum/assignation-free.pdf
-----
A LA DEMANDE DE :
1) Monsieur HARALD WELTE
Né le 11 février 1979, de nationalité allemande,
Demeurant 11 Glanzstrasse 12437 Berlin, Allemagne
Exerçant la profession de développeur de logiciels
2) Monsieur Erik ANDERSEN
Né le 4 août 1971, de nationalité américaine,
Demeurant 352 N. 525 East, Springville, UT 84663, USA
Exerçant la profession de développeur de logiciels
3) Monsieur Rob LANDLEY
Né le 1er février 1972, de nationalité américaine,
Demeurant 2413 Leon St #106, Austin, TX 78705, USA
Exerçant la profession de développeur de logiciels
-----
Now they are asking an award of EUR 3,2 million in damages.
LOL
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Rjack, 2009/02/12
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/12
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/15
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Hyman Rosen, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/02/13