Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[amicus_curious]

"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message 
news:3WEnl.22791$uG1.9805@newsfe16.iad...
> amicus_curious wrote:
> > Heck, the source code was made available before the case was filed, even. 
> > But it was made available by someone who was not even sued.  How do you 
> > explain such a curious thing?
>
> Once legal action begins, it becomes difficult to ignore
> inconvenient requirements and people get prodded into action.

You are saying the SDLC does not bother with the details of their cases? 
That seems illogical.