[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:07:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
"amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:
> "David Kastrup" <dak@gnu.org> wrote in message
> 85r61r4nvu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz">news:85r61r4nvu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz...
>> "amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:
>>
>>> If it fails early, it gets returned to the store or to the
>>> manufacturer for credit.
>>
>> If your whole computing centre gets compromised because a packet logger
>> could be inserted into the router, return to the store is your least
>> problem. Being able to determine possible scope of a security breach is
>> certainly important.
>>
> You create a whole lot of hypothetical situations, but people buy
> these things at Sam's Club for $35 and they work just fine.
It is fine that you live in a world without security breaches and
botnets, but there are people that are awake and with responsibilities.
> What compromise has there ever been that allowed someone to put a
> "packet logger" into the firmware of such a thing? Who would bother?
Uh, I recommed that you read some security advisories regularly if you
are really that computer illiterate.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, (continued)
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Thufir Hawat, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Thufir Hawat, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/24
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, David Kastrup, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/21
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Mart van de Wege, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Mart van de Wege, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/22
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Mart van de Wege, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, amicus_curious, 2009/02/23
- Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/02/23