Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Rahul Dhesi]

Rjack <user@example.net> writes:

>Section 3 of the GPL incorporates Section 2 which is rendered
>unenforceable due to 17 USC 301(a)....

Copyright invalid because federal law supersedes state law? What a
headline that would make.

Now if you could only get some defendant to actually argue this.

And by the way, you managed to contradict yourself. Only recently you
complained that the CAFC was ignoring state law. Now you're saying that
state law doesn't matter anyway. What a tangled web.

The biggest problem with all your reasoning so far is that the courts
and the defendants don't seem to see it your way.
-- 
Rahul
http://rahul.rahul.net/