Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Thufir Hawat]

On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:52:22 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:

>> You're begging the question.  Your "conclusion" is that the source need
>> only be available if it's been modified, and, since the source wasn't
>> modified, then it need not be available.
>>
> I am not arguing the meaning of the text contained in the GPL, I am
> saying that, unless the code has been modified in some useful way, then
> it is of no value to the community.


So you don't dispute the legality of the GPL?  You're just find it 
inconvenient?  If so, then don't distribute GPL'd software and go about 
your business.


-Thufir