Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Rjack]

Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> That is something else entirely. You neglected that little tidbit
> that they distributed GPLed binaries. By not distributing the
> source, they were breaching the sole licence which allowed them
> to distribute the binaries in the first place
>
> And *that* is every little bit grounds to sue them

And *that* is 100% bullshit. You can't just make up your own
copyright contract containing legal gibberish and then claim
it gives you legal grounds to sue someone.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)