|
| From: | Peter Köhlmann |
| Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:19:59 +0100 |
| User-agent: | KNode/0.99.01 |
amicus_curious wrote: > > "Rahul Dhesi" <c.c.eiftj@XReXXCopyr.usenet.us.com> wrote in message > news:go0i73$nuv$2@blue.rahul.net... >> Rjack <user@example.net> writes: >> >> [ still arguing promissory estoppel ] >> >>>> How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise? >> >>>"2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion >>>of it... >> >> Permission alone is not a promise. What is the writer of the GPL >> promising to do or not to do? >> -- > The leap here is the phrase "thus forming a work based on the Program". The only leap here is the one your two (slightly rotten) braincells are doing -- Another name for a Windows tutorial is crash course
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |