|
From: | amicus_curious |
Subject: | Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar |
Date: | Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:05:35 -0500 |
"Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1bLpl.46156$cI2.13269@newsfe09.iad...
Well, the link resolves to downloads.verizon.net and that is most certainly a Verizon site. Verizon does not need to make any source available at least in regard to the BusyBox library, and indeed does not do so, since the case filed by the SFLC complaining of that practice was dismissed with predjudice.On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:26:56 -0500, amicus_curious wrote: Does the binary file which is being distributed reside on the verizon server? If so, then Verizon would be required to make the source available upon request from a customer. If the binary isn't on a Verizon server then Verizon has no obligations is the argument. The fact that there's a link on verizon.com which causes this binary to download doesn't prove that the binary file is on a Verizon server.
Try the link yourself.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |