Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Thufir Hawat]

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:05:35 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:

> "Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1bLpl.46156$cI2.13269@newsfe09.iad...
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:26:56 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
>>
>>
>> Does the binary file which is being distributed reside on the verizon
>> server?  If so, then Verizon would be required to make the source
>> available upon request from a customer.  If the binary isn't on a
>> Verizon server then Verizon has no obligations is the argument.
>>
>> The fact that there's a link on verizon.com which causes this binary to
>> download doesn't prove that the binary file is on a Verizon server.
>>
> Well, the link resolves to downloads.verizon.net and that is most
> certainly a Verizon site.  Verizon does not need to make any source
> available at least in regard to the BusyBox library, and indeed does not
> do so, since the case filed by the SFLC complaining of that practice was
> dismissed with predjudice.
> 
> Try the link yourself.



None of the above demonstrate that the file(s) are stored on Verizon 
servers, the files could be hosted on Actiontek servers.


-Thufir