Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[Rjack]

Thufir Hawat wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 10:55:35 -0500, Rjack wrote:
>
> > > Any copying beyond that point is copyright infringement --
> > > the GPL itself says so.
> > The court will ignore what the GPL says and instead rely on
> > what The Copyright Act of 1976 (As Amended) says in light of
> > prevailing federal and state law.
>
>
> which imposes steep penalties per infraction.  To avoid those
> steep penalties a settlement will be agreed to.  The settlement?
> Follow the GPL.

The settlement agreement will, of course, be an agreement to pay
Cisco's attorney fees and require the SFLC to voluntarily dismiss
their silly propaganda suit -- same as always.

Nothing short of review by a court will settle the legal
enforcability of the GPL. The SFLC will NEVER, NEVER voluntarily
allow a federal district judge to interpret the GPL on the merits.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)