Re: Copyright Misuse Doctrine in Apple v. Psystar

[amicus_curious]

"Thufir Hawat" <hawat.thufir@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:haEql.53381$cI2.43976@newsfe09.iad...
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:41:17 -0500, amicus_curious wrote:
>
> > > None of the above demonstrate that the file(s) are stored on Verizon
> > > servers, the files could be hosted on Actiontek servers.
> > With a URL of download.Verizon.net?  Perhaps their servers could be
> > linked behind the scenes, but that would be rather unusual at best.  Why
> > would they do that in lieu of just storing a copy of the download file?
>
>
> The point is that you've not demonstrated that the files are stored on a
> verizon server yet proceed as if you have.
They are accessed via the Verizon webserver.  What difference would it make 
if they were somehow linked behind the scenes to some server owned by 
another company.  Do you seriously believe that is the case?  It would be 
very unusual for Verizon to have back office direct connections to 
Actiontec.