Re: Zonker on Open Source licenses ..

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Do you have any evidence that the defendants in the SFLC moronic
> > lawsuits have requested and RECEIVED a "reinstatement" of rights from
> > ALL copyright holders in the busybox program?
> 
> Of course. 

Increase the dose of your meds, Hyman.

http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2008/mar/17/busybox-verizon/

"As a result of the plaintiffs agreeing to dismiss the lawsuit and
reinstate Actiontec's and its customer's rights to distribute BusyBox
under the GPL, Actiontec has agreed to appoint an Open Source Compliance
Officer within its organization to monitor and ensure GPL compliance, to
publish the source code for the version of BusyBox it previously
distributed on its Web site, and to undertake substantial efforts to
notify previous recipients of BusyBox from Actiontec and its customers,
including Verizon, of their rights to the software under the GPL."

Where does it say that *non-plaintiffs* copyright holders in the busybox
program also agreed to "reinstate Actiontec's and its customer's
rights"?

Go to doctor, Hyman. ASAP.

regards,
alexander.

-- 
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)