[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the GPL is a license not a contract ..
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .. |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:14:30 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) |
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
> Doug Mentohl wrote:
>> Rjack wrote:
> For the past seventy years no federal court has ever ruled a
> copyright license to be anything other than a contract.
Who cares? One's got 7 letters, the other 8. It's the effect it has
which is important, not the name you give it.
> Sincerely,
> Rjack :)
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., (continued)
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Rjack, 2009/03/10
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
Re: the GPL is a license not a contract ..,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Rjack, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/11
- Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/11
Re: the GPL is a license not a contract .., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/11