Re: the GPL is a license not a contract ..

[amicus_curious]

"Doug Mentohl" <doug_mentohl@linuxmail.org> wrote in message 
news:gp8cfj$h5p$1@news.datemas.de...
> amicus_curious wrote:
>
> Microsoft's anti-GPL offensive this summer has sparked renewed speculation 
> about whether the GPL is ``enforceable.'' This particular example of 
> ``FUD'' (fear, uncertainty and doubt) is always a little amusing to me.
I don't think that this qualifies as FUD per se.  It goes more to the 
undermining of the FSF and the FOSS idea rather than to the promotion of 
Microsoft or even the demise of OSS as opposed to FOSS.  No GPL, no Stallman 
cult, is all it means.