[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL
From: |
Peter Köhlmann |
Subject: |
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:32:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.99.01 |
Rjack wrote:
> Thufir Hawat wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:44:38 -0400, Rjack wrote:
>>
>>> "IBM wasn't happy when Sun released Java under the GPL instead
>>> of a more permissive open source software license. It's
>>> possible that if IBM acquired Sun, Big Blue would move Java
>>> towards a multi-licensed approach and potentially put it under
>>> the Apache Software License in addition to the GPL. This would
>>> make it easier for Sun's Java technology to be integrated into
>>> existing open source Java implementations, such as the Apache
>>> Harmony project, and it would also make it easier for Java to
>>> be repurposed by third parties for proprietary uses."
>>>
>>> http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2009/03/report-ibm-eyes-sun.ars
>>>
>>>
>>> The SFLC suits are having an effect -- just not the one they
>>> hoped for. As more and more companies move away from "free
>>> software" to "open source software" the FSF propaganda campaign
>>> is falling flat on its ass.
>>>
>>> Sincerely, Rjack :)
>>
>>
>> You have it backwards. When *sun* licenses software, IBM likes
>> apache/ BSD type licenses. When *IBM* licenses software, ie
>> gnu/linux, IBM likes the gpl.
>
> You Freetards never learn. For Christ's sake, IBM was the World's
> first viscous computer monopolist. How soon Freetards forget! IBM
> likes anything that enhances their bottom line. Freetards are
> Micro$oft's enemy. IBM like Al Quaeda, believes "My enemy's enemy is
> my friend."
>
> IBM wrote the first edition book on computer monopoly practices.
> Micro$oft simply read that book and wrote the second edition. IBM
> will behead its Freetard friends the very second its becomes
> profitable to do so. I am utterly amazed at you Freetard sheep lying
> in bed with a Tyranasaurus like IBM. Big Blue knows the GPL is
> unenforceable and will wipe your Freetard asses with it the moment
> it's profitable to do so.
>
And here we have, folks: The dumbest post so far this year
Time to create a new "award". I propose "The DFS-award".
It should be awarded regularly to those who are incredibly stupid and full
of shit. Rjack has all of those
--
Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice which can be equally well
explained by stupidity
- IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/18
- IBM makes BILLIONS from GPL, 7, 2009/03/18
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL,
Peter Köhlmann <=
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, JEDIDIAH, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Terry Porter, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19