[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:25:57 +0100 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> It means that one can build a program which combines GPLed code and
> code under the other license and distribute it to users under the GPL
> as a whole.
Subsuming other non-GPL works (licensed without permission to sublicense
under the GPL) and pretending that "a whole" is under the GPL is utter
legal nonsense.
You're intoxicated on FSF Kool-Aid. It is extremely addictive to certain
individuals with socialist tendencies.
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, (continued)
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Rjack, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/19
- Re: IBM doesn't like the GPL, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/19