[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Red Hat on patent FUD
From: |
Ezekiel |
Subject: |
Re: Red Hat on patent FUD |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:01:22 -0400 |
"amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> wrote in message
news:49c4e206$0$32040$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
> "Ezekiel" <there@here.com> wrote in message
> news:gq2lda$7qm$1@reader.motzarella.org...
>
>>
>>> What I recently learned from BN and .....
>>
>> Absolutely ridiculous. If you really want to *LEARN* something about
>> Redhat and patents in general why waste your time reading a garbage site
>> like BN? Anyone with any brains would find accurate unbiased information
>> from a site that's more interested in actual facts then a crap site like
>> BN that's primarily interested in a twisted political agenda.
>>
>> So you get your "knowledge and facts" from BN.... that says more about
>> you than you know.
>>
> What is "BN"?
BN == BoycottN*vell
The 'for profit' web site run by the Schestowitz creep where he receives
payment for running Microsoft adds on his site while at the same time he
complains about others being biased because they receive advertising revenue
from MS.
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, (continued)
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, amicus_curious, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, dr_nikolaus_klepp, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/22
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, amicus_curious, 2009/03/22
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Doctor Smith, 2009/03/23
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, Ezekiel, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, amicus_curious, 2009/03/21
- Re: Red Hat on patent FUD,
Ezekiel <=
Re: Red Hat on patent FUD, RonB, 2009/03/21