[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:22:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
amicus_curious wrote:
It is sort of cutting their own throat, though. If something has no
commercial value, being free as in beer, any case asking for monetary
damages for violating its copyright could simply result in a summary
judgement for zero compensation.
The infringers would still be enjoined from creating further copies,
which would be fine from a GPL enforcement point of view. I think the
FSF might consider the loss of monetary damages for themselves to be
a fair trade.
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, (continued)
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/23
Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/23
Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23