[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:10:36 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:37:37 -0400, Rjack wrote:
>> The FSF doesn't go around helping Cisco pay less for copyright
>> infringement, but they might help Grandma vs. RIAA.
>
> Your Robin Hood analogy doesn't fly. The FSF promotes an illegal
> copyright license in an attempt to steal the exclusive copyrights of
> programmers. Illegal is illegal. Savvy Kemo Sabe?
Just an empty assertion of yours. No, the FSF doesn't promote an illegal
copyright.
-Thufir
- More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/23
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, JEDIDIAH, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/24
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Thufir Hawat, 2009/03/24
Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/23