[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More FSF hypocrisy
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:08:03 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
The doctrine of privity in contract law provides that a contract cannot
confer rights or impose obligations arising under it on any person or
agent except the parties to it
As usual, that is irrelevant to the operation of the GPL,
which is a license grant from the copyright holders to
people who wish to copy and distribute the covered works.
The only person who has any obligations imposed upon himself
is the person doing the copying and distributing, who is one
of the two parties to the GPL, the other being the copyright
holder.
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, (continued)
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, amicus_curious, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/26
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rjack, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Hyman Rosen, 2009/03/25
- Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Tim Smith, 2009/03/23
Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Rahul Dhesi, 2009/03/23
Re: More FSF hypocrisy, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/03/23