|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: More FSF hypocrisy |
Date: | Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:48:09 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:"For the foregoing reasons, the Court ... DENIES Jacobsen’s motion for preliminary injunction."You've cited the same district court that was overruled by the CAFC. The district court doesn't get to overrule its own appeals court.
Why don't you go looking for Jacobsen's requested injunction to enforce your beloved Artistic License ? The District Judge said NO.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |