Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
> The GPL isn't a contract. 

Hyman, please go to <http://www.ibm.com/ibm/sjp/>, click on "Send
e-mail", and let Sam know that his lawyers are a bunch of retards
failing to grok that "the GPL isn't a contract."

http://groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-881.pdf

------
SCO's GPL violations entitle IBM to at least nominal damages on the
Sixth Counterclaim for breach of the GPL. See Bair v. Axiom Design LLC
20 P.3d 388, 392 (Utah 2001) (explaining that it is "well settled" that
nominal damages are recoverable upon breach of contract); Kronos, Inc.
v. AVX Corp., 612 N.E.2d 289, 292 (N.Y. 1993) "Nominal damages are
always available in breach of contract action".).
------

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)