|
From: | Phil Da Lick! |
Subject: | Re: Microsoft and TomTom settle |
Date: | Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:30:10 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Rjack wrote:
Is "patent aggression" (being a patent plaintiff) anything like "copyright aggression?" (being a copyright plaintiff)?
Copyright aggression would be directed at the consumer. Patent aggression is generally directed at [would-be] competitors in protectionist ways.
"In our 'Professional' opinion"? This from "Professionals" who filed five consecutive copyright infringement cases for clients who had no registered copyrights. ROFL
Copyright doesn't need to be registered.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |