|
| From: | Thufir Hawat |
| Subject: | Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean |
| Date: | Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:50:10 GMT |
| User-agent: | Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:44:43 -0400, Rjack wrote: > The Free Software Foundation has *never* advanced a legal argument to > refute the fact that the GPL is contractually unenforceable and > preempted by the Copyright Act. What's your argument that isn't enforceable? -Thufir
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |