Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean

[Rjack]

RonB wrote:
> Rahul Dhesi wrote:
> > Rjack still hasn't specified which of the terms in the GPL are illegal.
> > And he protests:
> >
> > > Not at all. Try reading my posts instead of denying and lying.
> > ...
> > > You been told many, many times. Review past posts I've made instead of
> > > just denying and lying.
> >
> > OK, readers, I need your assistance here.
> >
> > I admit that I have not read everything that Rjack has ever posted.
> > Nor, I suspect, has anybody else, with the possible exception of
> > amicus_curious. But in the sample that I did read, I have not seen Rjack
> > ever specify exactly what in the GPL is illegal. For a short while I
> > thought he was referring to antitrust, but not, he said he was not.
> >
> > Has anybody seen any specific description from Rjack in his posts that
> > tells us what in the GPL is illegal?
>
> I killfiled Rjack shortly after his first message showed up. I have no 
> idea what he's yammering on about -- but I'm guessing he's pretty much a 
> crank in the "Snit mode." It doesn't matter how convincing your argument 
> might be -- he'll just rewind and re-spew -- starting the whole thing 
> all over again.
>
> That's the crank way. Best to just killfile him.

I totally agree.

Sincerely,
Rjack :)