Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed

[Hadron]

ray <ray@zianet.com> writes:

> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> Rjack wrote:
>>> Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.
>>>
>>> FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability claims
>>> for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the Freetard spin.
>>>
>>> The Cisco v. Free Software case was dismissed with prejudice and
>>> without award of court costs. (On PACER court record 4/22/2009)
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Rjack :)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The "Free" software bozos requested "the Court order Defendant to
>> account for and disgorge to Plaintiff all profits derived by Defendant
>> from its unlawful acts;"
>> 
>> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/complaint-2008-12-11.pdf
>> 
>> LMAO!  They sure do sound greedy for a not-for-profit, tax-exampt public
>> charity.
>> 
>> It should be unlawful to dump crappy open source code on the market for
>> less than the cost to produce it.
>
> Well DooFuS, one could also argue it should be unlawful to dump 
> propietary code on the market for exhorbitant prices.

What did you pay for your fat free milk today Ray?