[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed
From: |
dr_nikolaus_klepp |
Subject: |
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:11:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.10.9 |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>
> John Hasler wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov writes:
>> > Why would Cisco *NOT* consent to the dismissal of a lawsuit against
>> > Cisco with prejudice?
>>
>> Why *WOULD* the plaintiffs consent to the dismissal of a lawsuit against
>> Cisco with prejudice?
>
> Because the judge (at first ever GPL lawsuit conference) told Daniel Ben
> Ravicher and Aaron Kyle Williamson:
>
> Run out of this court as quick as you can with your incompetent
> complaint or face sanctions.
>
> Why not?
>
> regards,
> alexander.
>
so as usual you cannot provide a valid source of your "information", idiot.
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, (continued)
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, amicus_curious, 2009/04/23
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed,
dr_nikolaus_klepp <=