[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:31:47 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386)) |
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
>>> Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>>> Not at all. Plenty of sensible people who disagree with the FSF's
>>>> philosophy understand the GPL perfectly well - it's not difficult.
>>>> A whole wodge of lawyers at Microsoft, for instance. Possibly
>>>> even yourself.
>>> Alan, I understand the GPL from the official track record for
>>> infringement claims filed in U.S. Federal Court by the SFLC and FSF:
>>> 1. Dismissal Without Prejudice.
>> ....
>> Ah, here we go again, diverting a reasonably interesting thread back to
>> your tedious, forum-wrecking obsession. You want another 100 or so posts
>> on this do you, on top of the several thousand there's already been?
>> Sorry, I'm not playing.
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Rjack :)
> Since I started the reasonably interesting thread Alan, why not
> use your killfile? Just use your killfile.
What the heck are you talking about? As I said, I'm not playing your
silly game, and just what a killfile has to do with that is, at best,
obscure to anybody who isn't Rjack.
> Sincerely,
> Rjack :)
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
Re: GPL traitor !, Rjack, 2009/04/30