Re: GPL traitor !

[Peter Köhlmann]

Erik Funkenbusch wrote:

> On Tue, 5 May 2009 13:01:41 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out
>>   this bit o' wisdom:
>> 
>>> On Tue, 5 May 2009 07:13:19 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> 
>>>> Nice summary of standard legal procedure, corner cases, and
>>>> descriptions of uninformed people.
>>>> 
>>>> You know, the tip-of-the-iceberg stuff that people focus on for
>>>> purposes of FUD, while the vast majority /depend/ on the GPL.
>>>
>>> None of which supports Alan's argument that nobody can honestly
>>> misunderstand the GPL.
>> 
>> Nobody can honestly not understand the main meanings of the GPL.
>> 
>> That being said, version 3 is a bit more difficult to follow.
> 
> ahh.. now you move the goalpost.. the "main meaning".  The main meaning
> is certainly clear, but the details are where the trouble lies, and
> where most people don't understand or interpret differently.

You want to tell us with a straight face that those people are unable to 
read the GPL FAQ? Really?

Must all be wintendo fanbois like you and Hadron Snot Quark.
Only those lack the necessary braincells
-- 
To start your shiny new Pentium IV in Gameboy mode just enter
C:\win