Re: GPL traitor !

[Hadron]

Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@launchmodem.com> writes:

> After takin' a swig o' grog, Erik Funkenbusch belched out
>   this bit o' wisdom:
>
>> On Tue, 5 May 2009 07:13:19 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> 
>>> Nice summary of standard legal procedure, corner cases, and descriptions of
>>> uninformed people.
>>> 
>>> You know, the tip-of-the-iceberg stuff that people focus on for purposes of
>>> FUD, while the vast majority /depend/ on the GPL.
>>
>> None of which supports Alan's argument that nobody can honestly
>> misunderstand the GPL.
>
> Nobody can honestly not understand the main meanings of the GPL.

The "main meanings". Please outline these "main meanings" for us
Liarnut. But you won't because you know FULL WELL that the difficulty is
in the details and how it affects real businesses wanting to make real
income from GPL SW. God, your sycophantic sucking up to anything
remotely "advocate" is simply sickening.

>
> That being said, version 3 is a bit more difficult to follow.

A bit more difficult eh?

So its not really easy for everyone to understand then eh?

Christ on a bike - get a spine and be honest for once in your life.


-- 
In view of all the deadly computer viruses that have been spreading
lately, Weekend Update would like to remind you: when you link up to
another computer, you’re linking up to every computer that that
computer has ever linked up to. — Dennis Miller