Re: GPL traitor !

[Chris Ahlstrom]

After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
  this bit o' wisdom:

> In article <em5Ml.36994$i9.25373@bignews7.bellsouth.net>,
>  Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@launchmodem.com> wrote:
>> In any case, it is obvious that GPL 2 was very understandable by many many
>> people (e.g. Linus Torvalds), and they believed it served their interests
>> best.
>
> I take it you've never read the threads on the kernel list over whether 
> or not binary drivers in the kernel violate GPL?  There are a fair 
> number of kernel developers (not to mention RMS and others from the FSF) 
> who think Linus does *not* understand GPL.

Which version of the GPL?

In any case, my statement still stands, and is proven by history, not
opinion.

-- 
Every why hath a wherefore.
                -- William Shakespeare, "A Comedy of Errors"