[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
From: |
Thufir Hawat |
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
Date: |
Wed, 06 May 2009 21:08:40 GMT |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Tue, 05 May 2009 22:23:49 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>> Some the misunderstandings you cite are effects of the GPL. For
>> instance, sure, there's only a downstream requirment, but, in effect
>> improvements will make their way upstream. So, what's the harm of this
>> misconception?
>
> No, improvements don't necessarily make their way upstream. Let's say I
> create an app derived from GPL code. I sell it for $1 million dollars.
> Do you really think the guy that paid $1 million for it will just give
> the code away to others? Nope.
Effectively, they do, which is the source of the understanding.
Technically, no, there's no requirement to do so, but effectively, yes,
that's what happens.
-Thufir
- Re: GPL traitor !, (continued)
- Re: GPL traitor !, Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Thufir Hawat, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, DFS, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Peter Köhlmann, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !,
Thufir Hawat <=
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/05
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, JEDIDIAH, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, JEDIDIAH, 2009/05/06
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/05/07
- Re: GPL traitor !, Rjack, 2009/05/07