[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
|
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
|
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
|
Date: |
Fri, 08 May 2009 09:43:24 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
David Kastrup wrote:
Whether it comes under the scope depends on copyright
> jurisdiction, not the GPL.
Correct, of course, but there is no jurisdiction in which
a dynamically linked library would be considered to fall
under the copyright of a program which uses it.
- Re: GPL traitor !, (continued)
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/10
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/05/11
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/11
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/05/11
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/11
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/11
- Re: GPL traitor !, David Kastrup, 2009/05/08
- Re: GPL traitor !,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/08
- Re: GPL traitor !, Tim Smith, 2009/05/08
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/05/09
- Re: GPL traitor !, Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/05/08
- Re: GPL traitor !, Doctor Smith, 2009/05/08
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/08
- Re: GPL traitor !, David Kastrup, 2009/05/09
- Re: GPL traitor !, Thufir Hawat, 2009/05/10
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hadron, 2009/05/10
- Re: GPL traitor !, David Kastrup, 2009/05/11