[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPL traitor !
From: |
Rjack |
Subject: |
Re: GPL traitor ! |
Date: |
Sat, 16 May 2009 16:07:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote: [...]
This is false; if you link statically with a GPLed library, the
work as a whole must be distributed under the GPL.
Sez who?
Certainly not the US Copyright Act of 1976 (as amended) that was
signed by President Gerald R. Ford. Perhaps the GNU Copyleft Act of
1989 as decreed by Emperor Richard M. Stallman.
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
- Re: GPL traitor !, (continued)
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !, Joerg Schilling, 2009/05/15
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/16
- Re: GPL traitor !,
Rjack <=
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/05/18
- Re: GPL traitor !, Hyman Rosen, 2009/05/18