|
From: | Hadron |
Subject: | Re: [Matt Asay Tells The Truth] Stallman: GPL doesn't guarantee software freedom |
Date: | Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:11:47 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes: > Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> writes: > >> David Kastrup wrote: >> >> [... "the GPL is not a contract" ...] >> >> Both courts unequivocally said that the GPL is a contract. > > How comes you snip everything relevant from my reply before stomping > your feet again? As I already said: contract law applies since licenses > are held to the same standard. There are differences which I listed. > > You'll find that the courts did not rule on the side of "contract" > rather than "license" where any of those particular differences was > concerned. Sloppy language does not set legal precedence as long as it > does not make a difference regarding the _ruling_. All immaterial of course since companies just steal the code, rearrange it a bit and close source it. Sad but that's life.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |