Re: PJ lies about Terekhov--again

[Rjack]

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack <user@example.net> wrote:
>
> > Groklaw's Pamela Jones, the Sarah Palin of the Software World is
> > at it again:
>
> > "The court quotes from Microsoft Corp. v. Software Wholesale
> > Club, Inc.: "the first-sale doctrine does not apply to an
> > admittedly counterfeit unit". So, no, you can't buy a copy and
> > use it to go into a counterfeiting business, in effect.
> > Terekhov's theory has bitten the dust and then had to eat some.
> > Just like Daniel Wallace's anti-GPL theory did. Whoever is
> > relying on their legal theories might want to buy a vowel and try
> > to figure this puzzle out." 
> > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20091114101637997
>
> [ and so on .. ]
>
> Rjack, all this lot is pretty much off-topic here.  I think you'd
> be better debating the matter on groklaw itself, which has an
> active forum.

Yeah... an active forum and a black hole where reasonable disagreement
 is sent. Since when are GPL discussions "off topic" Lord Mackenzie?

Sincerely,
Rjack