Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 2/3/2010 10:42 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Got it now?
> 
>      so substantial and fundamental as to strongly tend to
>      defeat the object of the parties in making the contract
> 
> Got it now?

What makes you think that the controversial aspects of the GPL is just
void/unenforcable nonsense which can be safely ignored by the parties in
making the contract?

Only enforceable obligations can be breached silly Hyman. The
unenforceable nonsense can not be breached and is not part of the
contract.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)