gnu-misc-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++


From: Alexander Terekhov
Subject: Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:29:49 +0100

Stop trolling Mackenzie.

Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> 
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> 
> > Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> 
> >> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
> 
> >> > I don't understand your desire to infect separate and independeant
> >> > works via static linking and at the same time your desire to not
> >> > penetrate the infection through the dynamic linking.
> 
> >> "To penetrate the infection" ????  What the heck is that supposed to
> >> mean?
> 
> > http://www.umsha.ac.ir/jrhs/Upload/vol6num2/6-Vojdani%5B1%5D.pdf
> 
> > "Those prostheses contaminated by microorganisms such as gram-negative
> > Bacilli or Entrobacters could penetrate the infection into
> > oropharyngeal area and increase the risk of pneumonia"
> 
> > Got it now Alan?
> 
> Yep.  You were talking total garbage, and you've just googled the phrase
> and found something utterly irrelevant.  Aren't you clever?

I was talking about Hyman's position according to which the GPL
infection penetrates (and infects other separate and independent works)
through static linking and not penetrates through dynamic linking you
silly.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]