Re: Problem with GPLv3 FAQ about linking with Visual C++

[Alexander Terekhov]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> 
> On 2/4/2010 11:28 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > That permission is given by non-modify clauses regarding copying
> > verbatim you silly.
> 
> Of course it is not. Your deliberate misreading of

You misread the modify clauses of the GPL 

   v2: Section 2 "You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or 
       any portion of it . . ."

   v3: Section 5 "Conveying Modified Source Versions . . ."

focusing on its "mere aggregation" and "called an “aggregate”"
blathering.

BUT THIS CLAUSES ARE ABOUT ****MODIFICATION**** to begin with.

For all it matters suppose these "modify" permissions are nonexistent
and the GPL is reduced to Stallman's typical

"Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted
in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved."

article license.

Are you seriously suggesting that his bullshit articles can NOT be
included in collective works of others?

(That would be really great, BTW.)

Seriously, take medical help Hyman.

regards,
alexander.

--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm 
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can 
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards 
too, whereas GNU cannot.)